I live in a neighbourhood where an anguished woman’s wail (and the subsequent clattering of a freshly used knife dropping to the pavement) interrupt my tortured, acrobatic sleep once a month. Within five days of moving in, bored teens stole my semi-functional car before ditching it, flat tires and bumperless, outside of a Native Reserve by Okotoks. I’m approached regularly for drugs and have been offered the sexual services of tubby woman in a belly shirt in exchange. The moment a semi-attractive woman offers me such a deal, I’ll find a pound biker crank quicker than Nicky Barnes. Every time my girlfriend leaves my house after sunset, I have to cover her from a sniper nest on my roof as she gets in her car. And I’m ok with all of this. I have no problems living around drugs, inflation-resistant prostitutes and the lingering threat of drunken cowboys braining me with a beer bottle on my way home from Safeway. What I do have a problem with is that on the inevitable day I’m held up at knifepoint by a biker strung out on meth, the police won’t waste their time trying to catch him unless he does an illegal U-turn post-robbery or brags about his haul on his fucking cell phone while merging onto 17th. Continue reading
Tag Archives: Social Justice
I sometimes forget I wanted to be a serious journalist at one point. I’m not sure I even have to ability to write objectively anymore. I read this and I cringe. I suppose that’s why I’ve been using my Journalism diploma as a coaster these past three years
The great Taser debate rages on. For those keeping track, though Tasers have been killing people since their inception, and used recklessly by police for years, the issue blazed into mainstream policy discussion following the video-recorded death of Robert Dziekanski at Vancouver International Airport two months ago.
First, the UN Committee against Torture likened the use of stun guns to “a form of torture.” Shortly after, Taser International fired back at the UN, calling them “out of touch” and insinuating that their efforts to ban the Taser would, in turn, cause more torture. At least, that’s what I got from it. Here’s the exact quote from Taser International Founder and Chairman Tom Smith:
“TASER devices have saved thousands of lives worldwide and dramatically reduce injuries of officers and suspects in every community they are deployed.
“We would hope that the United National Committee Against Torture, as well as human rights group around the globe, would embrace our revolutionary technology and choose to work with us in our efforts to reduce violence and protect life. Simply issuing baseless and factually incorrect statements will not end violence or torture and may only serve to weaken efforts intended to protect life.”
I follow some of that, and a part of me agrees with the pro-Taser crowd. I would rather cops use a two second electrical jolt to stop a knife wielding maniac than use their guns. I also think more people have died or become seriously injured after cops get too carried away with their batons than by the Taser.
That was until the Taser killed a Nova Scotia man a few weeks later. And another, in Montreal. Then I read a report by Amnesty International which said Tasers were extremely dangerous (especially seeing as how they were applied to cuffed victims in half the deaths covered in the report), and called for the suspension of their use. I’ll admit Amnesty can be quite alarmist, but I, in this case, agree with most of their findings.
It seems to me, police are turning to the Taser much too quickly. If a situation escalates, officers simply reach for the Taser and take the suspect down. Tasers, while, in itself, an effective law enforcement tool, are not always used to diffuse dangerous situations but rather to punish noncompliance and perceived disrespect. Without getting into a police-bashing rant, I don’t think we can trust these people to use such a powerful weapon judiciously. Though not all police officers are as reckless doling out shocks as it now seems, we’ve been shown time and time again if a pain-causing device is given to someone in a position of authority (especially if they believe the weapon to be non-fatal), they will use it
Rather than ban the Taser outright, I think law enforcement should restrict their use to only the most dangerous situations.
I wouldn’t mind seeing the police departments adopt a requirement that all officers fill out a report justifying their use of the Taser, on the occasions they do. Also, the instances where Taser use is acceptable could probably use some tightening up – maybe restricting use to instances where the suspect approaches the officer with a weapon and a few others where the officer or a civilian is in immediate danger.
Like an 18-year-old runaway on the casting couch minutes before her first porn shoot, I await with a mixture of excitement and trepidation as I prepare to cross through airport security. Sure, I’m going to be violated by a husky man in a crew cut, and we’ll both probably lose a bit of our souls in the process, but once I step foot on European soil – moments before my wallet and passport are lifted by a gypsy child – it’ll all be worth it. Kind of.
So, I’m catching up on news, columns, etc. and, as expected, there was yet another flowering piece on Obama and just how close he is to a caramel Jesus. I don’t even want to link to it. I’ve never been so angry at a news story since I read Kim Kardashian was marrying Kris Humphreys. No, I’m not sure that’s how you spell his name and I won’t waste my time looking it up. Anyway, I just quickly want to make a point before the TSA Agent snaps on his plastic gloves and takes me to the Calgary International Airport Champagne Room for a…deeper inspection.
- Sorry people, but Barack Obama might be just as evil and corrupt as George W. Bush. Now that he’s offered (and seemingly insistent) on cutting Social Security and Medicare, it’s getting more difficult to ignore all his broken campaign promises. Not only did he promise to withdraw all troops from Iraq by 2009 and lie, he began another “campaign” (read: illegal aggression on a foreign country) in Libya, continued the Predator drone attacks on Pakistan (killing an estimated 900 people last year) and, to top it off, has added Somalia to his list of things to bomb. It seems eloquence and friendliness to reporters goes a long way to shaping public opinion – which is possibly why Obama is so dangerous. He has the media – and as an extension – a Liberal subculture in his back pocket. This is a liberal subculture, mind you, that Obama doesn’t belong to and will do nothing to champion their agendas. But while Bush stammered and squinted at a Teleprompter he couldn’t read, Obama – one of the world’s greatest orators – is funny, engaging and friendly to the media. It makes all his bullshit that much easier to swallow.